I think I know that… no, I don’t know

I get annoyed by our culture’s observing of forces that lead to change and of reviewing the psychological explanations that contribute to a person’s or society’s development. What else should I expect though? Apart from an understanding that all things consist in and from God who has created all things these observations are empty. They (the observations) seek to explain things without any answers. If answers are given then they are empty as well.

Truth is reality whether we like it to be or not… regardless of my or anyone else’s opinion, or knowledge, or study. If I wish, or believe, or think with all my might that you, who are reading this text, ¬†never existed, it will not change the truth that you exist. If we try with all of our might to use the study of the physical world as our system of knowing things and remove God from it, it does not change the truth that God is and that God created. If I am emotionally engaged by the God of the universe and someone else is not and they say “that’s good for you, but I don’t get anything from God” that doesn’t mean the truth of God is not there.¬†

So how can all of the cultural observations and psychoanalysis be relevant apart from a correct understanding of truth as reality and the foundations of that truth originating in the God who creates the beings who are trying to study the physical (or spiritual) world. All study is empty without it. Therefore everyone who says otherwise must strive to prove God does not exist or not in the manner in which we suppose (as He has revealed).